Tuesday, May 17, 2005

Trucker Arrested for Stealing $1.5mil Basquiat

Queens District Attorney Richard A. Brown inexplicably poses with the painting after police recovered the untitled work allegedly stolen by 35-year-old truck driver, Anthony Porcelli Jr., of Staten Island. (Does Brown think the painting's owner appreciates the fact that they've unwrapped the painting just for a photo-op? Are there professional art handlers there? Even so, is this appropriate?)

Porcelli allegedly stole the work, which was headed for either Rome or London, depending on which account you read, from a warehouse at JFK Airport. Apparently he had no idea what he was taking:

The large wooden crate had only the word "painting" on it when it was swiped from an air cargo warehouse at Kennedy Airport.

So the Staten Island truck driver who allegedly took it earlier this month had no idea what it held: a work by artist Jean-Michel Basquiat that is worth more than $1.5 million, authorities said yesterday.

"He saw it there, he pushed it, he figured he'd take a shot with it," Det. Michael Mormino of the Queens District Attorney's office said of the safely recovered painting, allegedly stolen by Anthony Porcelli. "He didn't know he hit the lottery."

Again, though, why is the DA bellying up to the painting for the photographers?

12 Comments:

Anonymous Macallan said...

Does Brown think the painting's owner appreciates the fact that they've unwrapped the painting just for a photo-op?

You assume the owner is happy they found it. $1.5mil? I'd rather have the insurance money than that...[sacrilege deleted]

5/17/2005 05:39:00 PM  
Blogger Edward_ said...

Mac...Basquiat is a God...really, every now and then you see a painter who can paint and even rarer than that you see a painter who can make that important...Basquiat is the latter.

my 2 cents, anyway

5/17/2005 08:54:00 PM  
Anonymous Macallan said...

If you say so. Look like crap to me. But then I admit I don't know crap.

5/17/2005 09:14:00 PM  
Blogger Edward_ said...

There's an exhibition of his work at the Brooklyn Museum right now. If you're interested.

5/17/2005 10:20:00 PM  
Blogger Edward_ said...

Oh, and one other source for info...this review by Jerry Saltz of the Village Voice.

Give it a read.

5/18/2005 01:55:00 PM  
Anonymous Macallan said...

Thanks for trying to help me "get" him. Some of the works linked in the Saltz review were better than the other ones so far, but of course this line did jump out at me "He was also wildly uneven. Some of his work looks like junk."

:-)

5/18/2005 02:05:00 PM  
Blogger Edward_ said...

"He was also wildly uneven. Some of his work looks like junk."

As Coagula rightly noted, "Most art sucks." , so you're right to be suspect. And even Picasso reportedly noted that the very best artists have at least 100 crap paintings in them (of course I think he meant by that that artists shouldn't be worried about making a bad piece, but rather should just keep making art). So it's no surprise that a few Basquiat's are not as good as some others.

5/18/2005 02:19:00 PM  
Anonymous Jay C said...

In this case, I will agree with Macallan's estimations, IMNSHO Jean-Michel Basquiat is the perfect example of an artist becoming "famous" not on any grounds of skill, technique, or creativity, but solely because other people more "famous" than he decided he should be "famous" too, and no one wanted to gainsay the judgment of the Cool Ones. That he kicked the bucket early didn't hurt, either (supply, demand & all that).
Anyway, DA Brown was probably posing with the recovered Basquiat for the same reason fisherman like to string up the "big one" for a photo-op; just to prove their story. Although AFAICT from this photo, Mr. Brown's opinion of this work is on a par with Mac's and mine.......

5/21/2005 05:55:00 PM  
Anonymous Jay C said...

Uhh.."unknown" @ 5:55pm is me, Jay C - login problem?

5/21/2005 06:46:00 PM  
Blogger Edward_ said...

jay c,

I respectfully disagree regarding JMB's skill, technique, and creativity. I've seen dozens of his better pieces and they're fresh even today...he was a painter's painter, there are passages other artists would give body parts to be able to do, and he had a urgency to his message and technique that is exhilerating. That's no mean feat.

5/21/2005 07:38:00 PM  
Anonymous Jay C said...

OK, I get the picture......
(pun intended)

In the interest of comity and civility I'll make a point to leave JMB out of future comments - after all, for arguments and snark, we have political blogs........

5/21/2005 09:38:00 PM  
Blogger Edward_ said...

after all, for arguments and snark, we have political blogs........

Arguing about art is fine by me...snark is trickier, but lord knows I do it all the time.

5/21/2005 10:27:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home